F640 in Georgia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Georgia cites F640 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.37×
1.37 times the share F640 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Georgia citations0.40%
Of every deficiency written in Georgia in 2025, this is the portion that was F640.
Georgia0.40%
National0.29%
Share of all citations that were F640.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Georgia surveyors wrote
F640 findings written in Georgia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 16, 2026
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within the timeframes specified in the RAI manual for one of three residents (R) (R76) whose MDS submissions were reviewed. This failure had the potential for the discharged resident not to be able to receive services elsewhere because Medicare was not aware of the discharge status and for an inappropriate payment for services to the facility.Findings include: Review of the October 2025 RAI Manual revealed on page 2-39:09. Discharge Assessment-Return Not Anticipated . …
C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadFebruary 25, 2024
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion of to CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for eight residents (R ) (24, 29, 23, 35, 1, 12, 7, and 18) of 35 sampled residents.
Findings include:
1. A review of R24 MDS list revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed the MDS was completed but not transmitted.
2. A review of R29 MDS list revealed a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed that the MDS was completed but not transmitted.
3. A review of R23 MDS list revealed an Annual MDS dated [DATE]. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction