F640 in District of Columbia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2024
District of Columbia cites F640 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.56×
1.56 times the share F640 takes of citations nationally.
Share of District of Columbia citations0.51%
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2024, this is the portion that was F640.
District of Columbia0.51%
National0.33%
Share of all citations that were F640.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F640 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMarch 20, 2024
Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence a resident's Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed as evidenced by not coding the resident's cognitive patterns in Section C. Resident #89.
The findings included:
Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction and Multiple Sclerosis.
Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed:
An Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented: Section C - Cognitive Patterns, Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (C0200-C0500) be conducted? 1. Yes. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction