F730 in Oregon. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Oregon cites F730 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share3.05×
3.05 times the share F730 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Oregon citations1.05%
Of every deficiency written in Oregon in 2025, this is the portion that was F730.
Oregon1.05%
National0.34%
Share of all citations that were F730.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Oregon surveyors wrote
F730 findings written in Oregon, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
F · No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadAugust 21, 2026
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 8/20/26 at 11:43 AM annual performance reviews for Staff 4 (CNA), Staff 5 (CNA), Staff 6 (CNA), Staff 7 (CNA), and Staff 8 (CNA) were requested from Staff 1 (Administrator). Staff 1 stated annual performance reviews were not completed for any facility CNAs.On 8/21/26 at 11:22 AM Staff 12 (Human Resources) stated no facility CNAs received annual performance reviews because they were part of a union. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction