Deficiency Index

F730 citations in Minnesota

Nurse aide performance review · Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies

Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F730 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Minnesota cites F730 less often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share0.79×

0.79 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.

Share of Minnesota citations0.27%

Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F730.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Minnesota surveyors wrote

F730 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternDecember 18, 2025

Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 5 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-B, NA-C, and NA-D) whose personnel files were reviewed. This deficient practice had potential to affect all residents who currently resided in the nursing home and who could receive care from this staff. Findings include:The following nursing assistant (NA)'s personnel records were reviewed for annual performance reviews and identified the following:NA-A was hired on 7/12/13. NA-A's last performance review was dated 10/4/22.NA-B was hired on 2/5/21. NA-B's last performance review was dated 2/5/23.NA-C was hired on 5/24/22. NA-C's last performance review was dated 7/18/23.NA-D was hired on 8/20/21. …

Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota

C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadJuly 29, 2025

Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for 4 of 5 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-B, NA-C and NA-D) who had been employed by the facility for over one year.Findings include:NA-A staff listing identified a hire date of 8/22/1996. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-C staff listing identified a hire date of 3/12/2019. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-D staff listing identified a hire date of 1/11/2024. An annual performance evaluation was requested and not received.NA-E staff listing identified a hire date of 1/4/2023. …

Rochester Restorative Care Center

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of Minnesota citationsvs expected
20230.13%0.37×
20240.12%0.33×
20250.27%0.79×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else Minnesota surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction