F804 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F804 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.76×
0.76 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.70%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F804.
Minnesota0.70%
National0.92%
Share of all citations that were F804.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F804 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 27, 2026
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide food to a resident that was palatable and ensure it was served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for dietary service.Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R3 had diagnoses of sickle-cell disease, anemia, anxiety, depression and was cognitively intact.R3's care plan, dated 5/25/26, directed to monitor food and fluid intake and diet per physician order and recommendation. R3's signed by the nurse practitioner order, signed on 8/1/26, directed R3 to have a regular diet.During an observation on 8/26/26 from 12:09 p.m. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction