F685 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F685 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.08×
2.08 times the share F685 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Minnesota citations0.50%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F685.
Minnesota0.50%
National0.24%
Share of all citations that were F685.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F685 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJune 5, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered vision services were arranged and provided by failing to schedule and follow through with a routine referral to a retinal specialist for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for vision services. This failure had the potential for more than minimal harm by delaying evaluation and treatment of reported vision symptoms and potential diabetes-related eye conditions. Findings include: R31's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/26, indicated R31 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, protein-calorie malnutrition, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction