F573 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F573 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.42×
0.42 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.04%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F573.
Minnesota0.04%
National0.09%
Share of all citations that were F573.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F573 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 29, 2025
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R1) received a copy of their medical record per request in a timely manner, within 2 working days upon request excluding weekends and holidays. Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted R1 had moderately impaired cognition. Section F identified preferences for customary routine and activities. Interview for daily preferences indicated it was very important to have family, or a close friend involved in discussions about your care.R1's Medical Record Request form dated 7/1/25, identified family member (FM)-A requested R1's entire medical record from 5/19/25 until 6/11/25. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction