Based on Interview and Record review, the facility failed to provide training that supports current scope and standards of practice through curricula which detail learning objectives, performance standards and evaluation criteria for 3 (Staff A, B, C) of 5 staff reviewed for abuse and neglect training. The findings included: Review of the Facility policy on Abuse Protection and Response last revised 1/22 which stated, The center will train staff, through orientation and ongoing in services in abuse prevention and response. Record review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff A hired on 4/24/24 showed she did not receive Abuse and Neglect training that detailed learning objectives, performance standards and evaluation criteria. …
F943 citations in Florida
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Florida cites F943 less often than its own record predicts
0.34 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Florida in 2025, this is the portion that was F943.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Florida surveyors wrote
F943 findings written in Florida, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Florida citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.04% | 0.28× |
| 2024 | 0.03% | 0.24× |
| 2025 | 0.03% | 0.34× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Florida surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction