Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure: (1) Resident #150's record contained accurate documentation related to the staging of her wound. (2) Resident #179's record contained accurate documentation of skin sheets. (Residents #150 and #179)The findings included: 1. Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Fracture of First Lumbar Vertebra, Abnormalities of Gait Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.The policy Procedure: Pressure Injury Assessment/Treatment with a review date of 01/26 documented in part, There are four stages of pressure… …
F842 citations in District of Columbia
Medical records · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
District of Columbia cites F842 more often than its own record predicts
2.15 times the share F842 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2025, this is the portion that was F842.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F842 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of District of Columbia citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5.45% | 3.36× |
| 2024 | 3.57% | 1.90× |
| 2025 | 4.80% | 2.15× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction