F641 in New Jersey. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Jersey cites F641 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.42×
1.42 times the share F641 takes of citations nationally.
Share of New Jersey citations2.61%
Of every deficiency written in New Jersey in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.
New Jersey2.61%
National1.84%
Share of all citations that were F641.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Jersey surveyors wrote
F641 findings written in New Jersey, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 20, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess the status of a resident in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 36 sampled residents, (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following:On 08/19/2026 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #1 who stated they go to dialysis three times a week, on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays at 9:30 AM. According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to end stage renal disease (kidney disease) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternApril 9, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for accurately coding the MDS according to the Resident Asessment Instrument (RAI-used to assess and care plan residents).
The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:
On 04/07/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #87. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction