Deficiency Index

F641 citations in New Hampshire

Accuracy of assessments · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F641 in New Hampshire. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

New Hampshire cites F641 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share1.37×

1.37 times the share F641 takes of citations nationally.

Share of New Hampshire citations2.52%

Of every deficiency written in New Hampshire in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What New Hampshire surveyors wrote

F641 findings written in New Hampshire, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 27, 2018

Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess one of one residents on an antipsychotic medication for side effects in a final sample of 24 Resident #37 Findings include: Review on 9/27/18 at approximately 8:15 a.m. of Resident #37's medical record in the assessment section revealed that Resident #37 has a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 4/22/18 the consultant pharmacist recommended that an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment be completed as the last one documented in the medical record was on 9/17/17. Further review of Resident #37's medical record revealed that an AIMS assessment was not completed until 8/22/18. Interview on 9/27/18 at approximately 8:36 a.m. …

Cedar Healthcare Center

B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJune 4, 2026

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessment and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer in a final sample of 30 residents. (Resident Identifier are #23, #38, #109, and #129.)Findings include:Resident #23 Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #23's Entry Tracking Record with an entry date of 3/11/26 revealed that under item A0810 - Sex was coded Male. Review on 6/2/26 of Resident #23's admission Record revealed that Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 and had the assigned sex of female. Interview on 6/4/26 at 1:02 p.m. …

Pleasant View Center

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of New Hampshire citationsvs expected
20230.82%0.48×
20243.30%1.96×
20252.52%1.37×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else New Hampshire surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction