.Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally required nursing assessment) assessment accurately represented the residents' status for 2 residents (#'s 1 and 3), out of 8 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care planning and goals which could affect their overall health and wellbeing. Findings:Resident #1 Record review on 3/9-13/26 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, acquired absence of left leg below knee, and history of falling. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/20/25, revealed: [Section] J1800. …
F641 citations in Alaska
Accuracy of assessments · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Alaska cites F641 less often than its own record predicts
0.29 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Alaska in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Alaska surveyors wrote
F641 findings written in Alaska, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Alaska citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2.92% | 1.71× |
| 2024 | 0.78% | 0.46× |
| 2025 | 0.53% | 0.29× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Alaska surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction