F641 in Colorado. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Colorado cites F641 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.12×
0.12 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Colorado citations0.22%
Of every deficiency written in Colorado in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.
Colorado0.22%
National1.84%
Share of all citations that were F641.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Colorado surveyors wrote
F641 findings written in Colorado, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJanuary 16, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected residents' status based on the criteria outlined in the resident assessment instrument (RAI) for one (#99) of one resident out of 59 sample residents.
Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessments for Resident #99 accurately documented that the resident had a preadmission assessment screening and resident review (PASRR) Level II qualifying diagnosis.
Findings include:
I. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction