F641 in Kentucky. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Kentucky cites F641 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.68×
0.68 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Kentucky citations1.26%
Of every deficiency written in Kentucky in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.
Kentucky1.26%
National1.84%
Share of all citations that were F641.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Kentucky surveyors wrote
F641 findings written in Kentucky, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedMarch 16, 2018
Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility's Accident/Incident report, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of seventeen (17) sampled residents (Resident #37) accurately reflected the resident's wandering status. Record review and interviews with staff revealed Resident #37 wandered daily and attempted to leave the facility through exit doors. In addition, on 01/25/18, Resident #37 left the facility without staff knowledge and a passing motorist had to alert the facility that the resident was outside. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 28, 2026
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's job description, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set [MDS] assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 3 of 17 sampled residents, Resident (R) 10, R38, and R41 for physical restraints. Refer to F604The findings include: Review of the facility's job description MDS Coordinator revealed the duties and responsibilities included scheduling, completing, and submitting MDS assessments in accordance with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and state and federal regulations. Review of the facility provided MDS, dated [DATE] at 10:57 AM revealed it did not have R10, R38, and R41 coded for physical restraints. …
C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadJune 28, 2018
Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 User Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of seventeen (17) sampled residents received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment (Resident #30).
Resident #30 was admitted from the community on 12/08/17, however, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. revealed staff inaccurately coded Section E of the Admission MDS Assessment
as a 0, indicating Resident #30's behavior was the same as compared to the previous assessment when there was no previous assessment. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction