Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's MDS assessments included correct assessment information. This was true for 4 of 12 residents (#3, #4, #7, and #37) whose MDS records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:The facility's Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program policy, undated, documented all applicants to the facility will be screened for serious mental disorder or intellectual disability and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. …
F641 citations in Idaho
Accuracy of assessments · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Idaho cites F641 more often than its own record predicts
3.25 times the share F641 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2025, this is the portion that was F641.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F641 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Idaho citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.48% | 0.28× |
| 2024 | 2.69% | 1.59× |
| 2025 | 5.98% | 3.25× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Idaho surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction