Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 out of 65 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide written information to the resident or resident representative the duration of the state bed hold policy, during which the resident was permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Specifically, residents were transported to the hospital and were not informed of the facility bed hold policy. Resident identifiers: 5, 8, 123. Findings included: 1. …
F625 citations in Utah
Bed-hold notice · Resident Rights Deficiencies
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Utah cites F625 less often than its own record predicts
0.50 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Utah in 2024, this is the portion that was F625.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Utah surveyors wrote
F625 findings written in Utah, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Utah surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction