Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
F625 in Nevada. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Nevada cites F625 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.57×
0.57 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Nevada citations0.16%
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2025, this is the portion that was F625.
Nevada0.16%
National0.29%
Share of all citations that were F625.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F625 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJanuary 16, 2025
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy notification to 1 of 17 residents (Resident #2) and/or the Resident's Representative upon transfer to an acute care hospital. This deficient practice had the potential to cause confusion and prevent the Resident Representative from being informed of the right to exercise the bed hold provisions and any associated fees.
Findings include:
Resident #2
Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction