Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify/provide the resident/resident's legal representative of the bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital and failed to provide written documentation of the bed hold policy to the legal representative for one (Resident 16) of 8 sampled residents. The facility's census was 15. Findings are: A closed record review revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 16 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. A review of the care notes revealed no documentation of a bed-hold policy being given to Resident 16 or Resident 16 family representative at time of transfer. …
F625 citations in Nebraska
Bed-hold notice · Resident Rights Deficiencies
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Nebraska cites F625 less often than its own record predicts
0.68 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Nebraska in 2025, this is the portion that was F625.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nebraska surveyors wrote
F625 findings written in Nebraska, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Nebraska citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1.27% | 2.05× |
| 2024 | 0.90% | 1.30× |
| 2025 | 0.19% | 0.68× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Nebraska surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction