Based on interview, record review, document review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to offer the resident and her representative an offer, in writing, of a bed hold before transferring and subsequently discharging Resident (R) 5 from the facility. In addition, the facility failed to recognize the resident's right to have access to a bed hold during her hospital stay for up to 14 days, regardless of the bed hold agreement. The findings include: Review of the facility's document Transfer and Discharge, undated, revealed the bed reservation and bed-hold policy that explained the rights of a resident up to 14 calendar days for hospital admissions. …
F625 citations in Kentucky
Bed-hold notice · Resident Rights Deficiencies
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Kentucky cites F625 more often than its own record predicts
1.46 times the share F625 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Kentucky in 2025, this is the portion that was F625.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Kentucky surveyors wrote
F625 findings written in Kentucky, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident and resident's representative at the time of transfer for hospitalization s that specified the duration of the Bed Hold policy for five (5) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents #60, #63, #36, #43 and #20). The findings include: 1. Record review revealed the facility readmitted Resident #43 on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. review of the resident's medical record revealed [REDACTED]. 2. Record review the facility readmitted Resident #60 on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. review of the resident's medical record revealed [REDACTED]. 3. Record review the facility readmitted Resident #20 on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. …
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Kentucky citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.62% | 1.00× |
| 2024 | 0.30% | 0.43× |
| 2025 | 0.42% | 1.46× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Kentucky surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction