F569 in Wisconsin. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Wisconsin cites F569 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.67×
0.67 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Wisconsin citations0.07%
Of every deficiency written in Wisconsin in 2025, this is the portion that was F569.
Wisconsin0.07%
National0.11%
Share of all citations that were F569.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Wisconsin surveyors wrote
F569 findings written in Wisconsin, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 8, 2026
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 residents (R) out of a sample size of 6 residents reviewed for conveyance of resident funds, had funds returned to the Power of Attorney (POA), family, or estate within 30 days of resident death. The facility did not refund R6's funds to POA within 30 days of discharge from facility.Findings include:R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under Hospice Private Pay and the facility was provided with a check for $8500.00. …
C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadSeptember 22, 2020
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for conveyance of resident funds, had funds returned to the POA, family, or estate within 30 days of resident death.
The facility did not have a process in place to ensure resident funds were conveyed within 30 days of death or discharge.
Findings include:
On [DATE] at 9:00 a.m., Surveyor toured facility. After tour completed, a sample of residents was chosen from a list of discharged /expired residents during time frame of [DATE] to [DATE]. This list included R1, who is noted in the complaint.
Surveyor reviewed R1's record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident expired [DATE]. Surveyor reviewed R1's account history. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction