F569 in California. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
California cites F569 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.23×
0.23 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of California citations0.03%
Of every deficiency written in California in 2025, this is the portion that was F569.
California0.03%
National0.11%
Share of all citations that were F569.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What California surveyors wrote
F569 findings written in California, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 22, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two of two sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 54) receiving Medicaid (a joint federal and state program that provides free or low-cost health coverage to people with limited income and resources) benefits notification when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the resource limit for one person, specified in section 1611(a)(3)(B) of the Act.This failure had the potential to result in the residents losing Medicaid eligibility. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternOctober 5, 2023
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to convey the remaining of trust fund to the responsible party within 30 days upon the death of the resident as per the facility's P&P for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for loss of the resident's fund.
Findings:
Review of the facility's P&P titled Patient Trust effective [DATE], showed the facility must surrender all resident trust funds to an authorized representative within 30 days upon the death of a resident.
Closed medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on [DATE]. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction