F569 in New Jersey. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Jersey cites F569 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.53×
2.53 times the share F569 takes of citations nationally.
Share of New Jersey citations0.28%
Of every deficiency written in New Jersey in 2025, this is the portion that was F569.
New Jersey0.28%
National0.11%
Share of all citations that were F569.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Jersey surveyors wrote
F569 findings written in New Jersey, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJune 1, 2026
Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents that maintained a Personal Needs Account (PNA) received a written notification when approaching the limit that could jeopardize a resident's eligibility for Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI).This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #33, #111, #122, #163 and #164) reviewed for PNA and was evidenced by: On 5/15/26 at 11:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the PNA balances as of 5/15/26. A review of the facility's Patient Fund Balances through 5/15/26 revealed 5 residents had balances that ranged from $1,846.70 to $2,385.22. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternNovember 14, 2018
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to transfer expired resident's personal needs account (PNA) funds back to the appropriate jurisdiction within 30 days of death. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for PNA accounting (Resident #159 and #309), and was evidenced by the following:
The surveyor reviewed the(NAME)Hall Resident Fund Balance Statement (CHRFBS) dated [DATE]. The CHRFBS indicated that Resident #159 expired on [DATE] and had a balance of $681.52 being held in the facility's account. A further review of the statement indicated that Resident #309 expired on [DATE] and had a balance of $200.38 being held in the facility's account. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction