F558 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F558 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.67×
0.67 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.74%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F558.
Minnesota0.74%
National1.11%
Share of all citations that were F558.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F558 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 11, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach and failed to provide an appropriate call light for 1 of 1 resident (R101) reviewed for accommodation of needs. R101 was unable to use the standard call light provided and required a soft-touch call light.Findings include:R101's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R101 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction