Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have an admissions policy in place; and failed to ensure residents and or their responsible party reviewed and signed an admission contract, informing them of the facility's approach to finances, residents' rights, care, treatment and services, and advance directives. Resident #95. The findings include: Facilty staff failed to ensure Resident #95 and or their responsible party reviewed and signed an admission contract. Resident #95 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] Review of the Resident's contract on 03/17/2022 dated showed that it was not dated and signed by the resident's responsible party. …
F620 citations in District of Columbia
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
No F620 citations were recorded in District of Columbia for 2025. That means none appear in the CMS file for that year — not that the requirement does not apply.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F620 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction