F606 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2024
Minnesota cites F606 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.64×
0.64 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.04%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2024, this is the portion that was F606.
Minnesota0.04%
National0.06%
Share of all citations that were F606.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F606 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMarch 29, 2024
Based on observations, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 staff member hired as a registered nurse (RN) was not employed by the facility with a disciplinary action in effect against his professional license by the Minnesota (MN) Board of Nursing. In addition the staff member hired as a RN did not hold a RN license, the staff's licensed practical nurse (LPN) license was suspended. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility.
Findings include:
49654
Review of LPN-A personal file revealed a lack of a copy of verification of professional license. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction