Deficiency Index

Lynn Care Center

Front Royal, Virginia · CCN 495316

15 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
114
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
County
Warren
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Jan 12, 2026

301 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.113.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.70—
Annual nurse turnover56.6%53.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$38,110 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K23.4%L—
Actual harmG23.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4576.3%E915.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.7%
CMS’s current file: 59 of the 114 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6574×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lynn Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Jan 12, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by other residents for 11 of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #127, #94, #126, #128, #25, #13, #41, #68, and #58, resulting in the identification of immediate jeopardy; and for Residents #48 and #35. The findings include:1. For Resident #127 (R127), the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #99 on 2/1/25.A review of the facility's final synopsis of events dated 2/6/25 revealed, in part: On Saturday, February 1, 2025, it was alleged that [R99] became agitated, combative and struck [R127] in her left eye on the memory care unit. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jan 12, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care, services, and adequate supervision for resident safety for two of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #99, resulting in the identification of immediate jeopardy and for Resident #40, resulting in harm. The findings include:1. For Resident #99 (R99), on twelve occasions in 2025, the resident physically assaulted other residents on the memory care unit, despite being known to have had previous aggressive behaviors. The lack of adequate supervision of R99 resulted in injury to two victims, Residents #127 and #128. On 2/1/2025, R99 struck Resident #127 in the left eye resulting in redness to the eye. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 6, 2023

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring during a transfer resulting in a fall and fracture which constitutes harm, for one of 44 residents in the survey sample; Resident #32. This was cited as past non-compliance. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring when transferring Resident #32 from the chair to the bed using a Hoyer (1) (mechanical) lift, resulting in a fall and fracture of the right elbow on 12/15/22. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: osteoporosis. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 31, 2021

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the prevention and treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 12/9/20, a knee immobilizer was placed on Resident #6's right leg in the emergency department due to a fracture. The facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order regarding removal of the immobilizer for assessments/checks of the resident's skin beneath and the area surrounding the immobilizer, failed to conduct weekly body skin assessments or assessments of the skin surrounded by the immobilizer from 12/11/20 until 12/21/20. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jan 12, 2026

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of 52 residents in the survey sample, Residents #94, #128, #25, and #13.The findings include:1. For Resident #94 (R94), the facility staff failed to revise the resident's care plan after she was abused by Resident #99 (R99).A review of the facility's final synopsis of events dated 2/20/25 revealed, in part: On Saturday, February 15, 2025, it was alleged that [R99] became combative and struck [R94] on the right side of her face on the memory care unit. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 114 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 12, 2026Standard and complaint19 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 7, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 25, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 6, 2023Standard and complaint20 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 31, 2021Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 23, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Apr 10, 2015Standard20 findings
  • Apr 17, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2013—5 findings
  • Jun 22, 2012—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction