Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct timely revisions of the comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) in a survey sample of 14 residents. For Resident #1 (R1) the failure to revise the care plan and implement interventions that ensured R1 received the required dialysis treatments as ordered, resulted in R1 missing 3 dialysis sessions and 3 partial treatments, which resulted in four hospitalization s. This constituted four occurrences of harm. The findings included: 1. …
F657 citations in Virginia
Care plan timing and revision · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Virginia cites F657 more often than its own record predicts
1.47 times the share F657 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Virginia in 2025, this is the portion that was F657.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Virginia surveyors wrote
F657 findings written in Virginia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 51 sampled residents, Resident #94, Resident #2, and Resident #12.The findings included: 1. For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) when hospice services were initiated. A facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans revised 11/14/25 specified The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. …
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan for 2 Residents (Resident #10 and Resident #13) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. 1. For Resident #10, the facility staff failed to revise the careplan to remove the intervention of one on one observation, when this service was discontinued. 2. For Resident #13 the facility staff failed to review and revise careplan to reflect Resident #13's Foley catheter was removed on 12/4/19. The findings included: 1. For Resident #10, the facility staff failed to revise the careplan to remove the intervention of one on one observation, once this service was discontinued. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. …
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Virginia citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3.56% | 1.66× |
| 2024 | 3.36% | 1.76× |
| 2025 | 2.75% | 1.47× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Virginia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction