F657 in Maine. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Maine cites F657 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.31×
2.31 times the share F657 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Maine citations4.31%
Of every deficiency written in Maine in 2025, this is the portion that was F657.
Maine4.31%
National1.87%
Share of all citations that were F657.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Maine surveyors wrote
F657 findings written in Maine, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 21, 2026
Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was accurately revised for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transfers. (Resident #1 [R1])Finding:On 7/21/26 at 9:00 a.m., during an interview with R1, he/she stated that they are assisted with transfers with 1 staff person standing by to make sure he/she maintains their balance.On 7/21/26 at 9:10 a.m., during an interview with a staff member who was providing care to R1, they stated that R1 is a contact guard assist for all transfers. Explaining that all they have to do for R1 is stand by and make sure they keep their balance and doesn't fall. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternAugust 27, 2025
Based on interviews, record reviews and observations the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #34 and #32), and failed to ensure a care plan was updated to reflect the current needs in the areas of falls and self-care deficit (Resident #43), and communication (Resident #6) for 4 of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed.Findings:
1. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction