F657 in District of Columbia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
District of Columbia cites F657 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.57×
2.57 times the share F657 takes of citations nationally.
Share of District of Columbia citations4.80%
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2025, this is the portion that was F657.
District of Columbia4.80%
National1.87%
Share of all citations that were F657.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F657 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 6, 2026
Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to revise and update Resident #112's care plan with goals and interventions to address a left medial lower leg and right knee abrasions. The findings included: Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment policy dated 05/24/24 documented in part: Develop the resident-centered care plan and interventions based on the risk factors identified in the assessments, the condition of the skin, the resident's overall clinical condition, and the resident's stated wishes and goals. The interventions must be based on current, recognized standards of care. The effects of the interventions must be evaluated. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction