What Virginia surveyors cite

Too few well-attested tags in Virginia to state a single finding, so the record is shown without one.

Data as of September 30, 2026, released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

The shape of it — 2025

Cited more, and less, than expected

Magenta is cited more often than expected, blue less often.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

The evidence

Every tag Virginia cites above its expected share

F684 · Quality of care1.16×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
65 citations across 58 facilities · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
F880 · Infection prevention and control0.62×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
50 citations across 45 facilities · Infection Control Deficiencies

How severe those findings were

Scope and severity

3.8% of citations found actual harm or worse (level G and above).

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
Severity	Isolated	Pattern	Widespread
Immediate jeopardy	J800.7%	K500.4%	L100.1%
Actual harm	G2832.5%	H50.0%	I—
No harm, potential for more than minimal	D7,66067.2%	E2,74224.0%	F3703.2%
No harm, potential for minimal	A—	B520.5%	C1501.3%

CMS grades every deficiency on harm level and how widespread it was. Letters G and above mean actual harm was found; J and above mean immediate jeopardy.

Browse all 289 Virginia nursing homes →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction