Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation Center
Charlottesville, Virginia · CCN 495420
17 surveys since 2016, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 112
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Albemarle
- Medicare-certified since
- 2016
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Oct 25, 2025
380 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.65 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 61.5% | 53.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $197,490 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4777.0% | E914.8% | F23.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6553×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 25, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: provide supervision for a resident identified as having exit-seeking behaviors; develop and implement interventions to prevent a resident elopement; ensure the accuracy of elopement risk assessments and timeliness of reassessment upon the identification of exit-seeking behaviors; ensure the facility's protocol for a missing resident (Code Orange) was promptly and correctly implemented when Resident #127 eloped from the facility on 05/11/2025 without staff knowledge; ensure Resident #133, identified by the facility as being at risk for elopement had their admission Record included in the facility's elopement binder; and ensure Resident #133's wander guard was securely… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 6, 2024
Based on observation, interviews, clinical record, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to prevent a worsening stage three pressure ulcer for one of 12 residents, resulting in harm for Resident #8 (R8), and failed to assess and implement treatment timely for a stage three pressure ulcer for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #5 (R5). 1. R8 did not have an accurate skin assessment, resulting in a delay in treatment of a worsening stage three pressure ulcer/wound. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 8, 2022
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate supervision and/or interventions for the prevention of falls for one of 25 residents (Resident #111), which resulted in actual harm and failed to ensure one of 25 residents (Resident #7) was safe when consuming hot liquids. Findings include: 1.) Resident #111's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: ataxia [impaired coordination] following a non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, [CONDITION(S)] syndrome, pancytopenia, headache, [CONDITION(S)], cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, dysphagia, mild protein calorie malnutrition, high blood pressure, [CONDITION(S)],… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Nov 14, 2024
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient dietary staff to provide timely meal delivery on four of four units. The findings include: There was an insufficient number of dietary staff working on 6/9/24 to provide preparation and service of breakfast for residents within the facility. Review of the dietary department as-worked schedule for 6/9/24 revealed that no dietary employees worked in the main kitchen, other than the dietary manager. A hand-written employee schedule documented one cook, and five dietary aides were scheduled to work on 6/9/24 from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF809Nov 14, 2024
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide timely breakfast service on four of four units. The findings include: There was no cooked breakfast provided to residents in the facility on the morning of 6/9/24. Posted breakfast times were 8:00 a.m. on the 200 and 300 units and at 8:30 a.m. on the 100 and 400 units. Posted mealtimes documented dinner was served daily at 5:00 p.m. (200, 300 units) and 5:30 p.m. (100, 400 units). Review of the dietary department as-worked schedule for 6/9/24 revealed no dietary employees worked in the main kitchen. A hand-written employee schedule documented one cook and five dietary aides were scheduled to work on 6/9/24, from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 112 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 25, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 11, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Feb 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 14, 2024Complaint9 findings
- Jul 26, 2024Complaint3 findings
- May 8, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2024Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Oct 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 8, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 19, 2021Standard13 findings
- Jan 15, 2020Complaint2 findings
- May 16, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
- Apr 26, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings
- Feb 16, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jul 27, 2016Complaint7 findings
- Jun 9, 2016Complaint10 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction