F655 in Virginia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Virginia cites F655 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.57×
2.57 times the share F655 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Virginia citations1.68%
Of every deficiency written in Virginia in 2025, this is the portion that was F655.
Virginia1.68%
National0.66%
Share of all citations that were F655.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Virginia surveyors wrote
F655 findings written in Virginia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 9, 2026
Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a complete baseline care plan for one of 26 residents, Resident #8.The findings include:For Resident #8 (R8) the facility staff failed to complete the baseline care plan for PEG (1) (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube care.On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, discharge assessment with a reference date of 4/24/2026, the resident was assessed as having a PEG (1) (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube and receives 51% or more of calories from enteral feeding. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction