Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documented evidence that the resident or the resident representative was provided with a written copy of the base line care plan. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. A review of the resident's Base Line Care Plan dated 10/14/23 documented in part, Initial Baseline Care Plan meeting held today for [Resident #1] 10/14/2023 in the resident's room with all the team members present. Resident responsible party] joined via telephone conference. …
F655 citations in District of Columbia
Baseline care plan · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
District of Columbia cites F655 more often than its own record predicts
1.48 times the share F655 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2024, this is the portion that was F655.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F655 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of District of Columbia citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2.27% | 2.84× |
| 2024 | 1.02% | 1.48× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction