Pheasant Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation
Roanoke, Virginia · CCN 495325
18 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 173
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 19
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 101
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- AVARDIS HEALTH
- County
- Roanoke City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Jul 28, 2026
104 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.27 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.8% | 53.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $235,820 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J49.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G613.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2556.8% | E715.9% | F12.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6845×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pheasant Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jul 28, 2026
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of a significant change in condition in a timely manner for two (2) of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident #95 and Resident #6.The facility's failure to recognize, act upon, and report a heart rate of 131 beats per minute to a medical provider for approximately six hours, likely caused and/or hastened the resident's death which occurred one to two hours after being sent out to the hospital with complaints of shortness of breath and chest pain.This resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #95. The survey team informed the facility on [DATE] at 3:28 PM of the Immediate Jeopardy situation regarding Resident #95. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Jul 28, 2026
Based on family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 6 of 51 sampled residents, Resident #94, Resident #2, Resident #33, Resident #95, Resident #29, and Resident #43. For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to remove the anticoagulant, Eliquis from the resident's active medication supply when discontinued on [DATE]. 12 Eliquis tablets were missing from Resident #94's Eliquis supply and were unaccounted for. Lab results obtained on [DATE] revealed a critically low hemoglobin of 6.7, a low hematocrit of 20.9, and PT/INR levels that were unable to be determined due to no clotting endpoint on the lab instrument. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF770Jul 28, 2026
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain lab testing as ordered by the medical provider for 8 of 51 sampled residents, Resident #94, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #12, and Resident #6. For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to obtain PT/INR results as ordered following the transition of Eliquis to Coumadin using a limited Lovenox bridge on four separate occasions from [DATE] through [DATE]. Lab results obtained on [DATE] and received by the lab on [DATE] resulted in a PT greater than 90 (reference range 9.60-11.33) and INR results that could not be calculated as the result greater than linearity. Resident #94 began showing signs of active bleeding on [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 21, 2024
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to appropriately respond to a decline/change in condition (lethargy, oriented to person only, clammy skin, Cheyne-Stokes labored irregular breathing) for one 1 of nine 9 sampled residents (Resident #9), resulting in death. The scope and severity was originally cited at Immediate Jeopardy, Level IV isolated, and was reduced to a Level III isolated after the facility was cleared of Immediate Jeopardy. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse were notified on [DATE] at 1:45 p.m. that the survey team had identified Immediate Jeopardy in the area of Quality of Care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 28, 2026
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse and physical abuse by another resident of the facility for 1 of 39 current sampled residents, Resident #69. The facility staff failed to (1) protect Resident #69 from sexual abuse by another resident (Resident #98) on 4/15/26 and (2) protect Resident #69 from physical abuse resulting from an altercation with another resident (Resident #64) on 7/04/26. The facility's investigation determined that the altercation on 7/04/26 resulted in a closed fracture of the right fourth metatarsal neck thus constituting harm to Resident #69. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 173 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 28, 2026Complaint12 findings · 5 harm
- May 7, 2026Complaint7 findings · 4 harm
- Nov 21, 2024Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 19, 2024Standard10 findings
- Aug 3, 2022Standard4 findings
- Apr 8, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2020Standard5 findings
- Feb 13, 2019Complaint13 findings · 2 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Dec 14, 2018Standard33 findings · 5 harm
- Sep 14, 2017Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2016Standard and complaint20 findings
- Oct 8, 2015Standard16 findings
- Nov 13, 2014Standard8 findings
- Jan 8, 2014—3 findings
- Dec 20, 2012—5 findings
- Oct 28, 2011—13 findings
- Dec 8, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction