Based on the review of the Facility's Arbitration agreement, CMS SOM Appendix PP, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the facility's arbitration agreement provided the selection of a venue that is convenient to both parties. This was true for all residents who reside in the facility who signed an Arbitration Agreement. This failure created the potential for residents to be inconvenienced or the inability to participate during the arbitration process. Findings include:On 6/24/26 at 4:15 PM, after review of the arbitration agreement and the federal regulation requirement the Administrator stated the arbitration agreement was missing the regulatory requirement of a convenient location of arbitration for both parties.
F848 citations in Idaho
Administration Deficiencies
Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Idaho cites F848 more often than its own record predicts
4.29 times the share F848 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2025, this is the portion that was F848.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F848 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Idaho citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1.43% | 24.68× |
| 2025 | 0.17% | 4.29× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Idaho surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction