F636 in South Dakota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2023
South Dakota cites F636 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.92×
0.92 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of South Dakota citations0.36%
Of every deficiency written in South Dakota in 2023, this is the portion that was F636.
South Dakota0.36%
National0.40%
Share of all citations that were F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What South Dakota surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in South Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternApril 14, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the provider failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 5 of 13 sampled residents (4, 5, 9, 13, and 17) were completed in a timely manner. Findings include:
1. Review of Section C. Cognitive Patterns in the significant change in status MDS, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/27/22 in resident 4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed:
*Item C0100 Should Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] be conducted? was coded as Yes.
*The interview items C0200 to C0400 were coded as Not assessed.
*Section C was signed by social services director (SSD) F on 12/29/22. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction