F636 in Idaho. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Idaho cites F636 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.66×
0.66 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Idaho citations0.17%
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2025, this is the portion that was F636.
Idaho0.17%
National0.25%
Share of all citations that were F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMarch 21, 2025
Based on review of the State Operations Manual-Appendix PP, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's diagnosed medical condition was documented on the resident's comprehensive MDS assessment. This was true for 1 of 7 residents, (Resident #9) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm if care decisions were based upon inaccurate or lack of information. Findings include:
The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, revised 8/8/24, documented a facility must make a comprehensive assessment using the RAI specified by CMS and include active disease diagnoses and health conditions. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction