Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a required Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment when a resident passed away in the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #20). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the accuracy of federally required reporting and compliance with MDS submission requirements.Findings include:Resident #20Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, and nutritional deficiency. Resident #20 expired on [DATE].On [DATE] at 11:18 AM, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) verbalized being the MDS Coordinator.On [DATE] at 1:54 PM, the CEO verbalized being notified MDS assessments needed to be completed when the electronic health record (EHR) assigned assessments. …
F636 citations in Nevada
Comprehensive assessments · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2023
Nevada cites F636 more often than its own record predicts
1.41 times the share F636 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2023, this is the portion that was F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Nevada surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction