F636 in Georgia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Georgia cites F636 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.46×
0.46 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Georgia citations0.11%
Of every deficiency written in Georgia in 2025, this is the portion that was F636.
Georgia0.11%
National0.25%
Share of all citations that were F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Georgia surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in Georgia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedApril 17, 2026
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for one of three residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 22 residents. This had the potential to lead to inaccurate goals of care, including functional and health status and strengths and needs of the resident. Findings include:Review of medical record 02/9/26 no evidence of documented transfer notification; einteract transfer or bed hold. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction