F636 in Arizona. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Arizona cites F636 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.51×
0.51 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Arizona citations0.13%
Of every deficiency written in Arizona in 2025, this is the portion that was F636.
Arizona0.13%
National0.25%
Share of all citations that were F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Arizona surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in Arizona, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJanuary 29, 2026
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the regulatory timeframe of 14 days after admission for resident (#3). The deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs. Findings include:-Regarding Resident # 3 Resident# 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with need for assistance with personal care, malignant neoplasm of prostate, uncomplicated substance abuse, long term (current) use of anticoagulants, and acute cystitis without blood in urine. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction