F636 in Montana. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Montana cites F636 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.63×
0.63 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Montana citations0.16%
Of every deficiency written in Montana in 2025, this is the portion that was F636.
Montana0.16%
National0.25%
Share of all citations that were F636.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Montana surveyors wrote
F636 findings written in Montana, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 16, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Discharge Minimum Data Set Assessment for a resident who passed away in the facility for 1 (#67) of 24 sampled and supplemental residents. Findings include: Review of resident #67's discharge summary with a date of 2/20/26 showed: . Narrative: Patient passed peacefully with her family by her side.Review of resident #67's electronic medical record showed:Minimum Data Set Assessment list: Tracking entry MDS with an accepted date of 2/12/26 had been completed.Comprehensive MDS with an accepted date of 2/19/26 had been completed.The electronic medical record failed to show that a Tracking (Death record) MDS had been completed after resident #67 passed away. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction