Deficiency Index

Willow Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Goldsboro, North Carolina · CCN 345113

34 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
118
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
200
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
County
Wayne
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.583.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover59.2%52.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$15,696 across 3 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG28.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1562.5%E312.5%F312.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 118 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Willow Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Aug 17, 2021

    Based on interviews with staff, pharmacist, physician, and review of facility, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and hospital records, the facility failed to recognize that blood sugar monitoring was indicated for a resident whose medication for diabetes was increased at a time when July blood sugars and A1C were within normal limits. The facility failed to check the blood sugar on a resident who was diabetic with altered mental status 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1). On August 4, 2021, Resident #1 was found to have altered mental status. Once EMS arrived, fingerstick was performed and it was 27. Resident #1 was started on an intravenous infusion of glucose and taken to the emergency room . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Feb 13, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to notify a nurse after an assisted fall and not move the resident after a fall before a licensed nurse's assessment. On 12/11/25, at approximately 1:45 PM, Resident #1 returned to the facility from dialysis, ate lunch, and then requested to be put back into bed. Nursing Assistant #1 (NA) entered Resident #1's room at approximately 2:45 PM. NA #1 attempted to complete a stand pivot transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. Resident #1's legs gave out, and NA #1 lowered the resident to the floor. NA #1 then assisted the resident back into the wheelchair. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 13, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff and Medical Director, the facility failed to follow the Resident Care Guide and use a mechanical lift prior to the transfer of a resident (Resident #1). On 12/11/25, at approximately 1:45 PM, Resident #1 returned to the facility from dialysis, ate lunch, and then requested to be put back into bed. Nursing Assistant #1 (NA) did not see any mechanical lifts immediately available and entered Resident #1's room at approximately 2:45 PM. Despite knowing that Resident #1 required a mechanical lift for all transfers, NA #1 attempted to complete a stand pivot transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. Resident #1's legs gave out and NA #1 lowered the resident to the floor. NA #1 then assisted the resident back into the wheelchair. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Jun 11, 2026

    Based on record review, and interviews with staff and Physician, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to check the accuracy of resident care equipment used to check blood pressure readings and temperature readings. Additionally, per interview with a Nurse Practitioner and a Physician, a facility's glucometer reading was difficult to reconcile with other known details regarding a resident's condition and treatment. This affected 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for change in condition and had the capability to affect all residents (Resident #2).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident # 2 resided at the facility for four days in April 2026 (4/23/26 to 4/26/26). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF582Nov 30, 2023

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a complete Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of non-coverage (SNF ABN) by omitting the estimated out of pocket cost for care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Residents #70, #134, #393). Findings included: a. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #70's record indicated the SNF ABN dated 11/8/23 had no estimated out of pocket cost for care documented on the form. Resident #70 remained in the facility with benefit days remaining. b. Resident #134 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #134's record indicated the SNF ABN dated 11/22/23 had no estimated out of pocket cost for care documented on the form. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 118 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 19, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Nov 30, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Nov 18, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Aug 17, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Jul 29, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 14, 2020Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Feb 22, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jul 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 1, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 26, 2018Complaint8 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Dec 1, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 12, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 7, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Oct 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 30, 2012—8 findings
  • May 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 2, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2011—1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction