Vcu Health Children's Services at Brook Road
Richmond, Virginia · CCN 49A022
5 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 12
- Surveys
- 5
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 47
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Richmond City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 20, 2023
1,299 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 9.41 | 4.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 4.93 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.4% | 35.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D240.0% | E240.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C120.0% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Vcu Health Children's Services at Brook Road, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Apr 20, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a care plan for five of 14 residents in the survey sample, Residents #19, #16, #29, #30, and #10. The findings include: 1. For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for the use of bilateral (both left and right) AFOs (ankle/foot orthoses-which are devices for positioning of the ankle/foot). On 4/19/23 at 9:53 a.m., R19 was sitting in a wheelchair in the facility school room. R19 did not have any positioning devices on their feet or ankles. RN (registered nurse) #2 stated the resident was not wearing an AFO at that moment, and that the staff would put the AFOs on if the resident was positioned in a stander. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Apr 20, 2023
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a Medication Regimen Review policy that included required time frames for pharmacist's review and physician's response to the pharmacist's recommendations, for five of 14 residents in the survey sample; Residents #22, #8, #10, #30, and #29. The findings include: 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication regimen review policy contained required time frames for pharmacist's review and physician's response. A review of the clinical record revealed all required monthly medication regimen reviews and no concerns were identified. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Apr 20, 2023
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 14 residents in the survey sample, Residents #7 and 22. The findings include: 1. For Resident #7 (R7), the facility staff failed to revise the care plan when the resident developed a pressure ulcer. A review of R7's clinical record revealed the resident was receiving treatment for a pressure ulcer. The record contained the following physician's order: Sodium Hypochlorous Acid (Vashe Wound Cleanser) 0.333% Once per day [for pressure ulcer] on Monday, Wednesday, Friday. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Apr 20, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to apply orthotic devices as ordered for two of 14 residents in the survey sample, Residents #19 and #16. The findings include: 1. For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to apply bilateral (both left and right) AFOs (ankle/foot orthoses) (devices for positioning of the ankle/foot) when the resident was out of bed. On 4/19/23 at 9:53 a.m., R19 was sitting in a wheelchair in the facility school room. R19 did not have any positioning devices on his feet or ankles. RN (registered nurse) #2 stated the resident was not wearing an AFO at that moment, and that the staff would put the AFOs on if the resident was positioned in a stander. […]
- No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF732Apr 20, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post the required staff posting for 33 of 33 days reviewed. The findings include: On 4/19/23 at approximately 10:30 AM a tour of the facility was conducted; the required staff posting for the shift was not observed posted. The facility document that was provided as the daily staff posting was reviewed for the period of 3/18/23 through 4/20/23. The document was a combined document of daily staff posting, as-worked schedule, and staff assignments. The document contained the date, shift, and census but it also contained resident names and did not contain staff hours. On 4/19/23 at 10:45 AM an interview was conducted with RN #2 (Registered Nurse) the unit manager. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 20, 2023Standard5 findings
- Oct 21, 2015Standard2 findings
- Nov 15, 2013—2 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 10, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction