Deficiency Index

The Village at Orchard Ridge

Winchester, Virginia · CCN 495415

8 surveys since 2014, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2014–2024
’14’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
20
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
NATIONAL LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES & SERVICES
County
Frederick
Medicare-certified since
2014

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 6, 2024

978 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.044.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.50—
Annual nurse turnover39.1%35.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Village at Orchard Ridge, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Mar 6, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a complete pneumococcal immunization program for five of five resident immunization reviews, Residents #6, #10, #12, #3, and #1. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to obtain and document the resident's current pneumococcal immunization status. A review of R6's clinical record failed to reveal documentation regarding the resident's pneumococcal immunization status or documentation that R6 was offered the immunization. On 3/5/24 at 2:00 p.m., a request for R6's pneumococcal immunization information was made to the facility administration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Mar 6, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 17 residents in the survey sample; Resident #8. The findings include: For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for the use of side rails. On 3/05/24 at 8:23 AM, Resident #8 was observed in bed with bilateral padded grab bars up. A review of the clinical record revealed Side Rail Assessment forms dated 9/19/22, 12/19/22 and 3/19/23. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Mar 6, 2024

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for administering medications for one of 17 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19. The findings include: For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to administer Simvastatin (1) as ordered by the physician. On 3/5/24 at 9:21 a.m., R19 was interviewed. She stated she did not think she had received all her correct medications when she was first admitted to the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 6, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physicians' orders to promote the highest level of well-being for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #20 and #10. The findings include: 1. For Resident #20 (R20), the facility staff failed to obtain daily weights as ordered by the physician. A review of R20's clinical record revealed he was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and edema (swelling). A review of R20's physician's orders revealed an order dated 3/1/24 for daily weights related to his congestive heart failure. Further review of R20's clinical record revealed no evidence of a weight on 3/1/24 or 3/2/24. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 6, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Apr 6, 2018Standard17 findings
  • Mar 29, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Apr 16, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Jun 24, 2014Standard4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction