The Village at Orchard Ridge
Winchester, Virginia · CCN 495415
8 surveys since 2014, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 8
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 20
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- NATIONAL LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES & SERVICES
- County
- Frederick
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 6, 2024
978 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.04 | 4.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.50 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.1% | 35.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Village at Orchard Ridge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Mar 6, 2024
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a complete pneumococcal immunization program for five of five resident immunization reviews, Residents #6, #10, #12, #3, and #1. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to obtain and document the resident's current pneumococcal immunization status. A review of R6's clinical record failed to reveal documentation regarding the resident's pneumococcal immunization status or documentation that R6 was offered the immunization. On 3/5/24 at 2:00 p.m., a request for R6's pneumococcal immunization information was made to the facility administration. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Mar 6, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 17 residents in the survey sample; Resident #8. The findings include: For Resident #8, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for the use of side rails. On 3/05/24 at 8:23 AM, Resident #8 was observed in bed with bilateral padded grab bars up. A review of the clinical record revealed Side Rail Assessment forms dated 9/19/22, 12/19/22 and 3/19/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Mar 6, 2024
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for administering medications for one of 17 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19. The findings include: For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to administer Simvastatin (1) as ordered by the physician. On 3/5/24 at 9:21 a.m., R19 was interviewed. She stated she did not think she had received all her correct medications when she was first admitted to the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 6, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physicians' orders to promote the highest level of well-being for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #20 and #10. The findings include: 1. For Resident #20 (R20), the facility staff failed to obtain daily weights as ordered by the physician. A review of R20's clinical record revealed he was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and edema (swelling). A review of R20's physician's orders revealed an order dated 3/1/24 for daily weights related to his congestive heart failure. Further review of R20's clinical record revealed no evidence of a weight on 3/1/24 or 3/2/24. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 6, 2024Standard4 findings
- Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 3, 2019Standard3 findings
- Apr 6, 2018Standard17 findings
- Mar 29, 2017Standard3 findings
- Mar 24, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 16, 2015Standard9 findings
- Jun 24, 2014Standard4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction