Cedarfield Pinnacle Living
Richmond, Virginia · CCN 495434
1 survey since 2026, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 2
- Surveys
- 1
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 20
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Henrico
- Medicare-certified since
- 2023
CMS ratings
- Overall
- —
- Health inspection
- —
- Staffing
- —
- Quality measures
- —
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
—
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.64 | 4.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 2.43 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.7% | 35.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cedarfield Pinnacle Living, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 22, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food service staff wore appropriate hair restraints (hairnets) while in the main kitchen and failed to ensure that frozen food items were stored in sealed, covered containers in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, with the potential to affect all residents' dependent on facility-prepared meals. (Main Kitchen)Findings include:1. Two dietary employees were observed wearing standard baseball caps through the main kitchen which did not effectively restrain their hair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF814Jul 22, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition and that the outdoor dumpster area was free of trash on the ground. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility by creating a potential harborage and feeding environment for rodents and pests. The findings included:On 7/20/26 at approximately 12:55 PM, during an initial tour of the exterior service and dietary loading dock area accompanied by the Executive Chef, inspection of the dumpster revealed the loose food debris, plastic cup lids, loose cardboard scraps, metal can lids and plastic gloves were scattered on the concrete pad directly beneath and surrounding the base of the dumpster. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 22, 2026Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- King's Grant Lacy Health CenterMartinsvilleno harm findings
- The Village at Orchard RidgeWinchesterno harm findings
- Vcu Health Children's Services at Brook RoadRichmondno harm findings
- Augusta Medical CTR Skilled CaFishersvilleno harm findings
- Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehabilitation PatriWilliamsburgno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction