King's Grant Lacy Health Center
Martinsville, Virginia · CCN 495408
10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 31
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 32
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Martinsville City · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2010
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.00 | 4.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.04 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.6% | 35.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E125.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at King's Grant Lacy Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 16, 2026
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and distribute food in the facility kitchen to prevent foodborne illnesses. The findings included: 1.The facility staff failed to discard out of date perishable food items and failed to label items when removed from the facility freezer. The kitchen contained out of date bread in the active food supply on two observations. The first observation had out of date bread dated 03/13/26 and the second observation had out of date bread of 4/7/26. On 4/14/2026 at 11:56 am, a walk through of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Director. Bread was observed placed on four trays in a separate area near the back of the kitchen containing sandwich breads and sandwich rolls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Apr 16, 2026
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #6.The findings included: Resident #6's CCP included the focus area full code. The clinical record included a provider order dated 01/17/2026 indicating the resident was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Resident #6's diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/08/26 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate the resident had problems with long- and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Sep 14, 2023
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine to 2 of 5 sampled residents for immunizations in accordance with nationally recognized standards, Residents #12 and #13. The findings included: 1. For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to offer the resident a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 (PCV20) or a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) following admission to the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Sep 30, 2021
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to accurately implement policies and procedures relating to DNR (do not resuscitate) status for two (2) of 30 facility residents (Resident #12 and Resident #26). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #12's and Resident #26's code status was correctly marked, outside the residents' room, according to the facility's process. The facility's process is that residents with an active DNR will have a blue dot sticker placed beside the resident's name that is posted on the nameplate sign outside of the resident's room. Resident #26's clinical record included a minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE]. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2026Standard2 findings
- Sep 14, 2023Standard1 finding
- Sep 30, 2021Standard1 finding
- Sep 20, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jun 15, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jun 11, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 11, 2014Standard10 findings
- Sep 11, 2013—1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Dec 13, 2012—5 findings
- Nov 3, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction