Deficiency Index

King's Grant Lacy Health Center

Martinsville, Virginia · CCN 495408

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
32
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Martinsville City · rural
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.004.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.04—
Annual nurse turnover30.6%35.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at King's Grant Lacy Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 16, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and distribute food in the facility kitchen to prevent foodborne illnesses. The findings included: 1.The facility staff failed to discard out of date perishable food items and failed to label items when removed from the facility freezer. The kitchen contained out of date bread in the active food supply on two observations. The first observation had out of date bread dated 03/13/26 and the second observation had out of date bread of 4/7/26. On 4/14/2026 at 11:56 am, a walk through of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Director. Bread was observed placed on four trays in a separate area near the back of the kitchen containing sandwich breads and sandwich rolls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Apr 16, 2026

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 1 of 13 current residents, Resident #6.The findings included: Resident #6's CCP included the focus area full code. The clinical record included a provider order dated 01/17/2026 indicating the resident was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Resident #6's diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #6's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/08/26 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate the resident had problems with long- and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Sep 14, 2023

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine to 2 of 5 sampled residents for immunizations in accordance with nationally recognized standards, Residents #12 and #13. The findings included: 1. For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to offer the resident a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 20 (PCV20) or a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) following admission to the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Sep 30, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to accurately implement policies and procedures relating to DNR (do not resuscitate) status for two (2) of 30 facility residents (Resident #12 and Resident #26). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #12's and Resident #26's code status was correctly marked, outside the residents' room, according to the facility's process. The facility's process is that residents with an active DNR will have a blue dot sticker placed beside the resident's name that is posted on the nameplate sign outside of the resident's room. Resident #26's clinical record included a minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE]. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Sep 14, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jun 15, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Sep 11, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Sep 11, 2013—1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Dec 13, 2012—5 findings
  • Nov 3, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction