Deficiency Index

Augusta Medical CTR Skilled Ca

Fishersville, Virginia · CCN 495214

9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
19
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
17
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Augusta
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 15, 2024

908 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.294.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.65—
Annual nurse turnover35.0%35.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD125.0%E125.0%F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B125.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 19 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Augusta Medical CTR Skilled Ca, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF655Jul 14, 2021

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility policy review and clinical record review, the facility stafffailed to develop baseline care plans to address immediate care needs and failed to provide a written summary of the plan for seven of seven new admission residents in the survey sample. Baseline care plans for Residents #65, #66, #67, #69, #165, #168 and #169 did not include all immediate care needs regarding management of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter), pain management, therapy services, medications and/or anticoagulant use. These residents nor their representatives were provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. The findings include: 1. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 15, 2024

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document, it was determined that the facility staff failed to prepare and store food in a safe and sanitary manner for one of one unit. The findings included: The facility staff failed to hold the cold food at a safe temperature, to label food items for storage, and to discard food by the used by date. On 5/13/24 at 6:30 p.m. a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. During the observation of the refrigerator, there was kidney beans, beets, prunes, celery - which was brown, and cut red onions stored in containers with no labels. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF583May 15, 2024

    Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a resident's personal privacy affecting one resident (Resident #110- R110) in a survey sample of 11 residents. The findings included: For R110, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's privacy was maintained during care, conversations with visitors, and during phone calls, due to the constant monitoring of the resident while in their room, via a video camera with auditory monitoring being observed by a staff member 24 hours a day. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, patternF625Jul 14, 2021

    Based on staff interview, facility policy review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #10. No written notice of the bed-hold policy was provided to Resident #10 upon admission or at the time of transfer to the hospital. The findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 4/16/21. diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #10 as cognitively intact. Resident #10's clinical record documented the resident was discharged to the hospital on 4/16/21 due to increased shortness of breath and tachycardia. […]

Read all 19 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 15, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jul 14, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Nov 12, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Oct 15, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Oct 19, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction