Deficiency Index

The Culpeper

Culpeper, Virginia · CCN 495400

12 surveys since 2012, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
56
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2023
’12’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
47
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Culpeper
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Oct 18, 2023

1,118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.694.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.33—
Annual nurse turnover20.0%35.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1368.4%E315.8%F15.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B15.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 56 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F6972×

    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Culpeper, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 18, 2021

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure injury for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #16. Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a stage two pressure injury on the sacrum/buttocks. The facility staff failed to complete ongoing thorough wound assessments including measurements and staging of the pressure injury from 10/30/20 thorough 11/19/20, and from 11/27/20 through 12/10/20, and failed to provide treatment to the pressure injury from 11/7/20 through 11/17/20, with the exception of 11/14/20. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 7, 2022

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain clean kitchen equipment in one of two kitchens, the main kitchen. The findings include: Observation was made of the main kitchen on 4/5/2022 at 11:28 a.m. The oven racks appeared to be covered in a brown substance. When asked what the cleaning schedule was, OSM (other staff member) #3, the executive chef, stated they should be cleaned on a weekly basis, but may have been missed last week. When asked if they could provide documentation when the ovens were cleaned last, OSM #1, the certified dietary manager, stated it was unlikely that they could provide that. On 4/6/2022 at 10:41 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Oct 18, 2023

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessments in a timely manner for four of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #48, #36 and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to complete the resident's quarterly MDS with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/7/23 within 14 days. A review of R1's clinical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 9/7/23. Further review of R1's clinical record revealed the MDS was not completed until 9/30/23 (23 days). On 10/17/23 at 2:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #1 (the MDS coordinator). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 18, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner in one of two nourishment refrigerators, the rehab to home unit refrigerator, and in one of two facility kitchens, the main kitchen. The findings include: The facility staff failed to maintain a clean main kitchen, and failed to store food safely in the main kitchen and in the rehab to home unit refrigerator. On 10/16/23 at 10:15 a.m., observation was made of the main facility kitchen. The upper oven contained a large amount of baked-on grease and dark particles on the doors, sides, bottom and back. The areas around the burners on the stove contained cooked-on grease, and a large amount of crumbs and dark black debris. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF697Apr 7, 2022

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a complete pain management program for one of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 24 (R24). The facility staff failed to clarify the physician orders, document the location of pain and document the level of pain for R24. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/24/2022, the resident scored a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 56 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 18, 2023Standard10 findings
  • Apr 7, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Sep 8, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2021Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 12, 2020Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Feb 23, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Mar 29, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Apr 26, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction