Deficiency Index

Kendal at Lexington

Lexington, Virginia · CCN 495034

14 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
107
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
KENDAL
County
Lexington City · rural
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Apr 24, 2024

929 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.884.85
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%35.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,033 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1669.6%E417.4%F14.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 107 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7562×

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Kendal at Lexington, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 24, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide staff assistance and supervision for a safe transfer for one of sixteen residents (Resident #1), resulting in a fall with fracture (harm). The findings include: Resident #1 (R1) fell when a privately hired companion/sitter attempted to transfer R1 from the bed to a wheelchair. The private companion did not request facility staff assistance with the transfer and had no prior documented training of facility policies that prohibited private caregivers/companions from performing direct-care activities, including transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 24, 2024

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections having the potential to affect residents on 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to respond to and implement quarantine and testing measures in accordance with CDC (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations to manage COVID-19 during an outbreak affecting 1 of 2 units. On 4/22/24 at 4:19 p.m., and again on 4/23/24 at 08:35 a.m., interviews were conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 24, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to prepare, store, and distribute food in a sanitary manner. The finding included: The dietary staff failed to label open food with an open date and the use by date, failed to dispose of out of date products, failed to ensure metal serving pans were dry before nesting, failed to clean the grill after use, failed to clean trays in the refrigerator after spills occurred, failed to hold proper food temperatures on the steam tables on the units, and failed to ensure beard guards were worn by applicable staff. On [DATE] at 10:59 AM, observations were made in the main kitchen during a tour with the dietary manager (other staff #5, OS#5). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF881Apr 24, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use for three residents (Resident #1- R1, Resident #34- R34, and Resident #27- R27) in a survey sample of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The findings included: On 4/23/24 at 08:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP). The IP was asked about the antibiotic stewardship program and was asked to explain the facility's process. The IP reported that she doesn't track any infections other than COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Jan 31, 2023

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a Foley catheter as ordered by the physician for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident # 1). Findings include: Resident #1 had an order to change the Foley catheter once every three weeks, but the medical device went unchanged for three months. Resident #1 was added to the survey sample as a closed record review, as there were no current residents with a catheter, Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility 2/25/22 with a readmitted [DATE]. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 107 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 24, 2024Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 31, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 17, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Apr 4, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Mar 7, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jan 27, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Feb 25, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Mar 6, 2014Standard and complaint17 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 24, 2013Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2013—3 findings
  • May 9, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 19, 2012Standard31 findings
  • Apr 28, 2011—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction