Regalcare at Worcester
Worcester, Massachusetts · CCN 225467
28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 171
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 18
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 160
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- REGALCARE
- County
- Worcester
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
May 6, 2025
552 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.41 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.40 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.0% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2167.7% | E619.4% | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B26.5% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5521×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
- F5651×
Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regalcare at Worcester, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF695May 7, 2021
Based on policy review, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards for four sampled Residents (#282, #130, #78, and #99), out of the 29 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #282, the facility staff failed to implement facility policy and ensure emergency respiratory equipment, including spare tracheotomy tubes of the correct size and type, were readily accessible at Resident #282's bedside according to Professional Standards of Care. Review of the facility policy titled, Tracheotomy Care, dated 2017, indicated a replacement tracheotomy tube must be available at the bedside at all times. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Sep 23, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 maintained acceptable parameters of weight when he/she experienced a significant weight loss of fifteen pounds, (5.48 %) in a thirty day period, was not identified as having experienced significant weight loss and immediate interventions were not implemented. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated as revised 2019, indicated the multidisciplinary team would strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents and indicated that the threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss would be based on the following criteria (usual weight subtracted by actual… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF658May 7, 2021
Based on document review, policy review, record review, observation and interview, the facility's staff failed to follow Professional Standards of Practice relative to 1.) Failing to follow a Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] .) Failing to maintain accurate documentation relative to in-service information and attendance, 3.) Failing to ensure the Dietitian's recommendations and Physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] .) The facility staff failed to ensure fluid restrictions were maintained as per the Physicians Order for one sampled Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 29 residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 7, 2021
Based on policy review, record review, observations and interviews, the facility's staff failed to ensure care/services were provided to prevent the development of a Pressure Injury for one sampled Resident (#78), and failed to provide appropriate treatment to aid in healing of a Pressure Injury for two sampled Residents (#129 and #46), out of a total of 29 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility Pressure Ulcers\Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol Policy, dated 2017, included the following: 1. The nursing staff and Attending Physician will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; for example, immobility, recent weight loss, and a history of pressure ulcer(s). 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692May 7, 2021
Based on observations, interviews and record and policy reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure care and services were provided relative to therapeutic nutritional interventions for one sampled Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Weight Assessment and Intervention, revised 2019, indicated the following: -interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents -nursing staff will measure the resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks or as recommended or ordered thereafter. […]
Read 38 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 38 of 171 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 6, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Apr 17, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jan 4, 2024Standard7 findings
- Jul 18, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jun 7, 2022Standard14 findings
- Oct 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 23, 2021Complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- May 7, 2021Standard29 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 31, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 4, 2019Standard13 findings
- Apr 3, 2019Standard5 findings
- Nov 13, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 14, 2018Standard8 findings
- Aug 1, 2017Complaint11 findings · 6 harm
- Jun 6, 2017Standard7 findings
- Oct 19, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 21, 2016Standard8 findings
- Feb 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2014Standard15 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 4, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Jul 21, 2014Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Jan 9, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 26, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 1, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 23, 2010—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill6 harm findings
- Blaire House of TewksburyTewksbury3 harm findings
- Hadley Pointe Nursing Rehab & CareHadley8 harm findings
- Andover Manor Rehab and NursingAndover5 harm findings
- Marlborough Hills Rehabilitation & Health Care CenMarlborough6 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction